I guess we will be hearing alot about balance in an unbalaced world when the status quo cease to be the status quo and Vis-à-vis will be more like what we are going to see from now on, and what comes around must go around. So lets cut and paste, close some files, out of windows down with flags. Send this scream and text that cry, the world has seen the children die.
........ but what's with the defacto(you know)?
shame on you BBC
BBC refused to air an appeal to help the people living in Gaza claiming that it would risk confidence in its impartiality.
John Ryley, head of Sky News, said "Our commitment as journalists is to cover all sides of that story with uncompromising objectivity,".
This echoed BBC director general Mark Thompson's concern that the corporation should not give the impression it was "backing one side" over the other.
I guess, this is true, but what I don’t understand is how would helping the devastated people in Gaza be interpreted as backing one side??? Actually Mixing humanitarian relief effort with politics is backing one side.
The picture is clear, unfortunately the people in Gaza undergoing through a humanitarian catastrophes as a result of Israel’ aggravated assault.
Ban ki moon descrided the crisis in a gaza as a distant one the palestinan have to endure compairing to their daily crisis and he launched an appeale for 613 million to help elevate the suffering of this humanotarian issues.
Another major appeal to help the palestinians overcome some measures of the hardship, but it seems that the boss in BBC and behind him the zionists in Israel were trying to punish the palestinians for their choice in 2006 election.
Anyway, The damaged has already been made to BBC’s neutrality by not responding positively to such a compassionate appeal.
Keep up the good job Thompson ,with a slap on his ass by his zionist masters.
Here is the video BBC refused to air
Question of the day
Do you think that Mark Thompson would have refused similar appeal requests to help Israel If the circumstances were the other way around ?
John Ryley, head of Sky News, said "Our commitment as journalists is to cover all sides of that story with uncompromising objectivity,".
This echoed BBC director general Mark Thompson's concern that the corporation should not give the impression it was "backing one side" over the other.
I guess, this is true, but what I don’t understand is how would helping the devastated people in Gaza be interpreted as backing one side??? Actually Mixing humanitarian relief effort with politics is backing one side.
The picture is clear, unfortunately the people in Gaza undergoing through a humanitarian catastrophes as a result of Israel’ aggravated assault.
Ban ki moon descrided the crisis in a gaza as a distant one the palestinan have to endure compairing to their daily crisis and he launched an appeale for 613 million to help elevate the suffering of this humanotarian issues.
Another major appeal to help the palestinians overcome some measures of the hardship, but it seems that the boss in BBC and behind him the zionists in Israel were trying to punish the palestinians for their choice in 2006 election.
Anyway, The damaged has already been made to BBC’s neutrality by not responding positively to such a compassionate appeal.
Keep up the good job Thompson ,with a slap on his ass by his zionist masters.
Here is the video BBC refused to air
Question of the day
Do you think that Mark Thompson would have refused similar appeal requests to help Israel If the circumstances were the other way around ?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
